Is achievement counterproductive?

I just read a great blog post by Ryan Norbauer on 43Folders called "Death and Underachievement: A Guide to Happiness in Work." It is definitely something that all you overachievers might find interesting...among everyone else for that matter.

Ryan takes the stance that achievement, particularly over-achievement, might not be the key to happiness and may cause more stress and more work in the long run.

He questions what we are supposed to be doing on earth while we are here "What is the ultimate summit we expect to reach? And if we can’t answer this question, why do we exert ourselves as if we're heading towards one?"

In conclusion: "There is no despair when we truly confront the empty promises of achievement—and view our work and accomplishments in the light of that insight. We don’t give up and shake our fists at the unfeeling universe and embrace total idleness. Nor do we ignore the awesome preciousness of the life and time that chance has bestowed upon us. We try to be nice, have a little fun, and expand our awareness of the world we live in. We do the best work we can, but we don’t fret when we fail, nor do we jeopardize the quality of our work—or the happiness of our days—by bowing to the pressure to take on more than we can handle."

Full blog post: www.43folders.com/2007/12/31/death-and-underachievement-guide-happiness-work

Comments (1)

I do not believe that Over achievement can be a source of stress on the Long run. Over achievement is beneficial at the youthful age on the short run. Its nice to be fulfilled when younger so that you need not stress yourself when advancing in age. Example is a 30year old pursuing a PhD and a 55year old doing same. The 55year old would be more disposed to stress than the younger

posted by Benjamin on 6/17/2009 6:50 am

Post a comment

You must be a registered user to comment. If you are already registered Click here to login or Click here for our fast, free registration.